So why the gel instead of the LiFeP?
<SHORT VERSION> Cost. 1/5 the cost of LiFeP.
<FULL STORY>
LiFeP has two major advantages.
1) Its cycle life (50%+ discharge and back to full) is somewhere in the 7,000 range. If you discharged it every day then it would last ~10 years.
2) Very light weight compared to Gel (20%-25% of a Gel cell).
Disadvantages:
1) Cost. 4x to 5x what a Gel Cell costs
2) Can be ruined in freezing weather. it's the charging cycle that kills them and most caution about using them below 40f. You can; install it in a heated environment, or don't use it below 40f, or pay even more for cells with a built in heater, which shortens the capacity.
3) Complicated. Very complicated internally, which multiplies the possible points of failures. Not like the old NiCd days. If one of your Li power tools goes defunct, crack open the case and take a peak.
I have yet to fully (50%) discharge my batteries, so the increased cycle life of LiFeP is no advantage in a purely backup situation. The weight is a bummer but I only plan on rolling it from one side of the garage to the other.
One other thing: LiFeP and Gel cells nor do not self-conflagrate, That is they won't catch on fire by themselves and they won't sustain a fire. Unlike Lithium Cobalt, LiCoO
2, and Lithium Manganese, LiMnO
2 which are used in cars, scooters, etc.. and catch fire seemingly frequently. I've notice Golf Cart makers tend to use LiFeP rather than the others. I