This is tragic. I'm on the outside but this looks a lot like whoever is voted in as prez is pretty much a figurehead? That leaves the staff with all the power and no real accountability if that assessment is correct?
Ya'll can delete my post but running that thing on the left coast in a liberal state just above Seattle...not the best decision in my book. It should be headquartered "in the thick of it" which I doubt is Washington state.
My 2 cents as a non-member. That and...a forensic accounting consultant to determine where the blood letting wounds are.
I used to be a volunteer (as in not paid) match director for both USPSA and Steel Challenge. That was about 12 years ago.
What still grinds my gears to this day is HQ never put anything in place to help new clubs get cardboard targets and steel targets at a discounted price. At that time, 12 years ago, the going rate for full size 42” tall pepper poppers was $250 each.
To get our first set of Steel Challenge targets one of my regular shooters requested a grant from the NRA. They were nice enough to send us a $5,000 check.
I absolutely agree with you that some forensic accounting firm needs to go through their books with a fine tooth comb.
HQ just announced two weeks ago that they were going to jack up the match entry fee for the 2024 National matches to $400 per entry.
There were 420 competitors at the 2019 Hi Cap Nat’s.
ASSuming that there are 50 Range Officers and staff for the match, that knocks it down to 370 paying customers.
That still comes out to $148,000 .
I am ASSuming the competitors still have to pay for their stay at the match hotel out of their own pockets (it has never been mandatory to stay at the match hotel, but I understand after X amount of rooms get paid for by the competitors, the hotel usually comps the rooms for the RO’s and staff).
Somehow I get this feeling that HQ will not be getting anywhere close to 420 shooters competing at any Nat’s level event this year.