My wife wonders why I still attend training courses at this stage of my life. “What could you possibly learn that you have not already heard?” she often asks. The truth is I don’t know what I don’t know so I continue to seek out additional knowledge. That said, I seldom hear anything new and all too often what I do hear is some instructor trying to spin old doctrine into new doctrine by making it sound “Special Operations-like”. The harsh reality is there are only so many ways to shoot a gun and they have all been invented. My friend Kelly McCann says, “If you want to learn something new, read an old book” which sounds a lot like what my grandmother used to say, “Just hang on, what is old will be new again…and someone smooth will try to sell it to you!” Man, was she right!
What I like to do is listen to an instructor explain why they think as they do, especially if their thought process is based on real world experience. I have heard it said that street or battlefield experience is not critical to be a shooting instructor and this is true…if all that is taught is shooting. However, if an instructor is teaching how to fight with a gun, having been in an event in which someone was trying, to the best of their ability, to end their life offers a perspective the non-tested instructor cannot comprehend. One can usually tell the instructor who has fought for their life…all that “ninja-fied” cool looking crap that is all the rage these days is not present in their lesson plan. Their techniques are simple, straight forward and easy to adopt into one’s skill set. Why? Because these instructors understand the complexities of conflict and know to keep it simple! Big words, ninja gear and slick looking techniques just don’t cut it.
The most gifted instructors have the ability to be verbally/visually descriptive…they can explain something in such a way that a student can get a picture in their mind of what is being presented. Thus, I am always looking for new ways to say something and for articulated reasons behind a given doctrine. The gifted trainer is a teacher, one who imparts knowledge and has the ability to not only explain, but can also demonstrate the skill in question. The best instructors can also agree to disagree with another by giving their reasons why they like something in such a way that it makes sense to the less informed. Just saying “this is how we have always done it” or “Because I (or some other instructor Guru) say so” is not good enough…at least for me.
It has become popular of late to bash Blackhawk’s SERPA holster as unsafe and while I understand the concern expressed, it simply is not true. The mishaps that have occurred with the SERPA are shooter error not a poor holster design. There… I have said it. Before I move forward understand that I do not work for Blackhawk, receive NO money from them nor do I have personal ties to the company other than I like much of their product line. I just happen to think the SERPA is a physiologically efficient holster design if retention is a desired feature. I have had many security holsters over the last 35 years. My first duty rig was a “suicide strap” swivel holster that quickly turned into a thumb break rig. I had both versions of the Bianchi front break revolver holster and when pistols became the standard, I had all the rock back, pull forward, turn outward, rotate over , hit this snap-turn-pull, jerk, slap, tug, pivot and every other security device available. What I could not help but notice is when the gun is secure from a gun grabber; it is also secure from me!
When the SERPA was first introduced I liked how intuitive the design was. It was the first multiple threat level holster that released its security devices consistent with the way the hand wraps around the grip to achieve a solid firing grip. There was no rotating this, pushing that, twisting, tugging, etc. The thumb went to the rear of the gun and pushed a button while the trigger finger was kept straight releasing a second device while it did so. What could be easier? The concealment version does not have the thumb release but is still released via the use of a straight trigger finger and this is where the problems begin.
Shooters who do not commit the required practice to the design begin to doubt their ability to push the index finger release button while quickly drawing so they turn the finger inward using the tip to depress the button which results in a trigger finger poised to enter the trigger guard as the gun is drawn. By doing this the shooter is using the SERPA improperly. There are ways to fix this if you like the idea of the SERPA but are concerned about your ability to hit the button during a crisis event. The first is to build up the button so it is easy to find. I have done this using GOOP, the well known rubber glue that was first marketed as SHOE GOO. Clean the SERPA button with alcohol and use masking tape to create a dam around the edge of the button. Fill the area with GOOP and let it dry. Once dry, make sure the taller button clears the edge of the holster when depressed. If not, use a craft knife or other sharp blade to trim excess. Stick a piece of skate board tape on top of the GOOP and you will have a button that is easy to depress.
Another way to raise the profile of the button is to block the SERPA button inward and remove the plastic guard that is molded into the holster at the forward edge (see photo). This allows the button to extend outward making it easier to hit. The last option is to practice with the holster until you can’t get it wrong. Remember the definition of a professional? A professional practices until they can’t get it wrong while an amateur practices until they get it right. Big difference if you stop to think about it. Can I understand why some instructors are banning the SERPA? Sure, if improperly used the SERPA can create an unsafe condition in their class and they really don’t want to test their liability insurance. I just believe an instructor does not only impart knowledge and build skills; he/she should also offer solutions for real world problems.
Stay safe and check your 360 often!
Dave Spaulding is the 2010 Law Officer Trainer of the Year and Law Officer’s Firearms columnist. A 28-year law enforcement veteran who retired at the rank of lieutenant, he is the founder of Handgun Compatives. He has worked in corrections, communications, patrol, evidence collection, investigations, undercover operations, training and SWAT—and has authored more than 1,000 articles for various firearms and law enforcement periodicals. He’s also the author of the best-selling books Defensive Living and Handgun Combatives. Visit his web site at www.handguncombatives.com and like him on Facebook.
There are several issues with the Serpa design;
1. Why in the hell would you place a retention device through the trigger guard? Yea, I know…the locking piece should never contact the trigger, but why do it?
2. Minimal dirt or debris will lock up the retention device.
3. Under stress (like I don’t know somebody shooting at you) it is easy to insert the finger into the trigger guard on the draw. Yes, this is to a large extent a training issue, but it’s a design flaw that creates a foreseeable event.
4. The attachment method for the holster to the belt attachment is exceptionally weak.
Given the negative attributes of the Serpa I can’t see why anyone who has a choice would carry one.
You fail to address the issue of debris locking the holster up. You also fail to address the inability of the mounting platform to survive a vigorous take away attempt. If it was safe, nobody would be banning them from their ranges. I defy you to name an top instructor/range that bans the Safariland ALS system.
Respectfully Dave, there are a number of other issues with the Serpa system that you fail to address with this article, including durability, how often debris jams the Serpa lock, and failure of the holster due to parts breakage under normal use.
I disagree with you on the issue of how the Serpa system works, this comes from three years of carrying the system daily and making a concerted effort to train hard with it.
Mr. Spaulding,
I am one of those shooter/Instructors who believes that the SERPA retention device is a flawed design. One of the theories that led me to this belief is found in an article that you wrote a few years back titled “The trigger finger conundrum”. The idea that the normal human startle reflex to clench-up and how it relates to inadvertantly making contact with the trigger during stress made a lot of sense to me, and still does.
It is hard for me to make a disconnect between this theory and how it relates to the design of the SERPA retention holster design. If it is the normal human reflex to clench-up under stress or when startled, how can we guarantee that even with regular training, atleast some of the shooters who carry a SERPA won’t default to this reflex and unintentionally flex their trigger finger to press the SERPA release while drawing from the SERPA holster instead of keeping the trigger finger straight?
I have done various tests relating to the SERPA release, and one of them is to depress the release with the finger curled/flexed and watch where the trigger finger lands once the trigger guard is clear of the holster. Nearly every single time the trigger finger ends up inside of the trigger guard or on the trigger.
Other concerns which are directly related to the “safety” of the SERPA holster in my opinion are the vulnerability of the release mechanism to getting easily fouled and seized-up by various mediums found on the ground such as mud, gravel, and snow. The other concern being the durabilty of the SERPA holster relating to a gun grab. I have been able to rip many pistols directly from the belt or cleanly from the holster of participants willing to sacrifice their SERPA holsters. The CQB SERPA’s commonly fail at either the belt attachment mounting screws, or the holster body splits in-half and releases the pistol. Some of the volunteers will commonly respond with something to the effect of: “Yeah that sucks, but I would never let someone get that close to me on the street”. Sure they wont.
I just wanted to share my concerns with the SERPA to get more feedback from you as I greatly value your opinions as a trainer.
Stay safe,
Nick D.
Mr. Spaulding,
Let m be one to say on this forum that I find the SERPA system to be a great retention holster. As far as my background goes, I have had 5.5 years as an active duty army officer and have recently moved into federal law enforcement. I carried the SERPA for my M9 for a whole year through Southern Afghanistan and never had any issues with it. I never used it under combat conditions, however I did conduct training with locals and from predeployment training through the whole year, never once did it fail me. I also never cleaned it and I carried it on a chest rig on my IOTV. I hope that at least provides one individuals testament of using the SERPA in harsh conditions.
Second, many individuals have addressed issues about inserting the finger during the draw, but common training from a federal law enforcement training dictates that the trigger starts to be pressed from the time the individual is in the high ready as they punch the gun out towards their target. If we are teaching law enforcement officers to have their finger on the trigger from position 3 to 4, why would you worry about possibly touching the trigger, even inadvertently, if the goal is to have a shot ready to fire as the gun is locked out in position 4?
I am not sure how many SERPA’s the haters how owned, but even with my 1911’s, I do not make the mistake of pressing the trigger as I draw. I hope others will come forward with their stories of good use with the SERPA.
I love the negative SERPA comments.
I, am an instructor as well. Have also carried a SERPA for quite some time. I also have observed many videos and read more than a few reports of “SERPA issues”. Bumpkus.
I’ve been wearing one every day for the last two years. Let me tell ya, it’s one hell of a holster. Hell, it grips my belt and pants so well, I can’t even get it off my pants some times and I’m not exactly fighting with someone else.
I like the comment above about minimal dirt or debris, really. Prove it. The only lockup I’ve seen is when it is covered, and I mean COVERED in snow. Nowhere near minimal. In fact, if your SERPA gets locked up from dirt and debris, you have a lot more issues like equipment maintenance issues.
The attachment method being weak, really? Funny, it’s lasted me longer than almost any other holster I’ve owned. And it rides on my right side, constantly getting hammered by my center console and seat belt buckle.
It’s a good retention holster that so far, has had the best retention qualities to aid me in keeping my firearm should someone try to grab it. Anyone that actually decides to practice with this piece of equipment will be rewarded with a well made holster.
If you don’t practice, or inspect your gear for replacement on a regular basis, it’s not the equipments fault if it’s not there for you when your life depends on it.